Back to Now
Craft

Why we built spare-part ordering around 3D drawings

A technician at a machine should never have to guess a part number. Here is how we made identification visual, and why that one decision changed the whole ordering flow.


Most spare-part mistakes start the same way: someone copies a number off a faded label, transposes two digits, and orders the wrong thing. The part arrives, it doesn't fit, the line stays down, and the OEM gets blamed for a problem the OEM never caused.

We wanted the person standing at the machine to point at the part, not decode it.

The decision

Early on we had two options for the ordering flow. The obvious one was a searchable parts list: type a number or a name, get a result. It's quick to build and every catalogue tool already works this way. The problem is that it assumes the person already knows what they're looking for. On a factory floor, mid-breakdown, that assumption breaks constantly.

So we built the flow around the exploded 3D drawing instead. The technician opens the drawing for their machine, taps the component that failed, and the right part surfaces with its number, availability, and a one-click path to an RFQ that goes straight to the OEM. Identification becomes a visual act, not a clerical one.

What it changed downstream

Because the part is identified from a structured 3D view rather than typed, the request that reaches the OEM is unambiguous. The quote itself still happens through the OEM's normal channel, but identification is no longer a guessing game.

It also kept the order with the OEM. When ordering is this direct, the technician has no reason to call a local fabricator who picks up first. The easiest path and the correct path became the same path.

The principle underneath

This is the kind of decision we keep coming back to: reduce the moment where a human has to translate the physical world into a code. Every translation step is a place for error to enter and for the relationship to leak out to whoever makes that step easier. If we can make the obvious action also the accurate one, we usually take that trade, even when it costs more to build.